Case Law Index International Agricultural Trade

January 1, 2002 – July 3, 2018

 

This index provides a comprehensive though not necessarily exhaustive compilation of reported and unreported federal and state court decisions involving international agricultural trade that were decided between the dates listed above.  The cases are listed in reverse chronological order. The “Text” link goes to the freely available Google Scholar text of the opinion.  These listings are for educational purposes only, and are not a substitute for legal counsel.


 

SUPREME COURT

Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 476 (U.S. 2005) (“farm winery” license)   Text


 

U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

United States v. Gateway Import Management, Inc., 324 F.Supp.3d 1328 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (government stated claim against importer of cigars and domestic purchaser seeking recovery of unpaid federal excise taxes) Text

Andritz Sundwig GMBH v. United States, 322 F.Supp.3d 1360 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (subject matter jurisdiction was lacking over importer’s lawsuit seeking to prevent emergency exportation of machinery in insect-infested packaging) Text

Government of Sri Lanka v. United States, 308 F.Supp.3d 1373 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (payments made by Sri Lanka government pursuant to its guaranteed price scheme for rubber (GPS) program did not constitute countervailable subsidies) Text

Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United States, 308 F.Supp.3d 1329 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (substantial evidence did not support Commerce’s conclusion in calculating dumping margin that Thai data, as surrogate value, was not aberrational) Text

Quiedan Company v. United States, 294 F.Supp.3d 1345 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (Commerce’s determination that importer’s agricultural training stakes fell within scope of antidumping duty order was reasonable)

United States v. Rupari Food Services‚ Inc., 298 F.Supp.3d 1347 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (importer who knowingly made materially false representations to customs regarding antidumping duty was liable for fraud-based penalty under Tariff Act) Text

United States v. Maverick Marketing, LLC, 295 F.Supp.3d 1349 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (government stated claim seeking to recover unpaid federal excise tax and prejudgment interest from importer and manufacturer pursuant to Tariff Act) Text

Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States, 296 F.Supp.3d 1295 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (importer did not have substantial likelihood of success on its claim that safeguard duties violated “escape clause” provision of Trade Act) Text

An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company v. United States, 284 F.Supp.3d 1350 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2018) (Department of Commerce’s remand redetermination explaining denial of separate antidumping rate of importer of frozen fish fillets was reasonable) Text

Kalle USA, Inc. v. United States, 273 F.Supp.3d 1319 (Ct. Int. Trade 2017) (textile tariff classification applied to imported casings manufactured by gluing textile-plastic composite sheeting together creating tubes to encase food) Text

Özdemir Boru San. v. Tic. Ltd. Sti., 273 F.Supp.3d 1225 (Ct. Int. Trade 2017) (Department of Commerce could use 14.01 percent rate based on adverse facts available after drawing inference against Turkish exporter) Text

Fla. Tomato Exchange v. United States, 255 F.Supp.3d 1362 (Ct. Int. Trade 2017) (substantial evidence did not support Commerce’s decision that suspension agreement would prevent suppression of domestic price levels for tomatoes) Text

Mondelez Global LLC v. United States, 253 F.Supp.3d 1329 (Ct. Int. Trade 2017) (genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether gum base could be classified under heading for “food preparation”) Text

An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company v. United States, 236 F.Supp.3d 1352 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (remand was required for Commerce to explain why surrogate value (SV) data sources on record did not lead to reasonable value) Text

Zhejiang Native Produce & Animal By–Products Import & Export Group Corp. v. United States, 227 F.Supp.3d 1375 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (evidence supported Commerce’s rejection of less reliable information when determining surrogate value for honey from non-market economy China) Text

Harmoni International Spice, Inc. v. United States, 211 F.Supp.3d 1298 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (Dinners associated with Thanksgiving and Christmas were not “specific cultural ritual celebrations” within meaning of HTSUS subheading) Text

WWRD U.S., LLC v. United States, 211 F.Supp.3d 1365 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (preliminary injunction prohibiting Customs from requiring importer to post bonds on garlic purchased from Chinese producer was not warranted) Text

United States v. International Trading Services, LLC, 222 F.Supp.3d 1325 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (Commerce’s determination that Vietnamese exporter was not entitled to separate antidumping rate was not supported by substantial evidence) Text

Imperial Sugar Company v. United States, 181 F.Supp.3d 1284 (Ct. Int. Trade 2016) (injurious effect of increasing import volume was completely eliminated by agreements to resolve AD and CVD petitions on sugar from Mexico) Text

SunEdison, Inc. v. United States, 179 F.Supp.3d 1309 (Ct. Int. Trade 2016) (Departure by Commerce from prior policy concerning antidumping duty calculations for solar panels produced in multiple countries warranted remand) Text

Coalition for Fair Trade of Hardwood Plywood v. United States International Trade Commission, 180 F.Supp.3d 1137 (Ct. Int. Trade 2016) (International Trade Commission’s threat of material injury determination was not supported by substantial evidence) Text

An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company v. United States, 179 F.Supp.3d 1256 (Ct. Int. Trade 2016) (selection of Indonesia as primary surrogate country was reasonable in antidumping duty order covering frozen fish fillets from Vietnam) Text

Tri Union Frozen Products, Inc. v. United States, 163 F.Supp.3d 1255 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2016) (substantial evidence supported decision by Commerce to use Bangladeshi data rather than data from India to value all raw shrimp consumption) Text

Fresh Garlic Producers Association v. United States, 121 F.Supp.3d 1313 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (substantial evidence supported Commerce’s determination that Chinese producer failed to cooperate in antidumping proceeding) Text

U.S. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading Pennsylvania, 91 F.Supp.3d 1324 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (fraud claim against importer for allegedly circumventing antidumping duties was alleged with sufficient particularity) Text

Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. U.S., 91 F.Supp.3d 1304 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (importer’s bauxite proppants were classifiable under HTSUS as aluminum ores and concentrates, rather than as ceramic wares) Text

Fresh Garlic Producers Ass’n v. U.S., 83 F.Supp.3d 1330 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (Department of Commerce’s selected surrogate value of inputs was based on best available information in antidumping review) Text

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi v. Ticaret A.S., 61 F.Supp.3d 1306 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (application of adverse facts available required further explanation in countervailing duty investigation) Text

Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 60 F.Supp.3d 1328 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (Chinese producer and exporter of polyester staple fiber was not required to exhaust administrative remedies with regard to double counting of coal in factors of production) Text

Coalition of Gulf Shrimp Industries v. U.S., 71 F.Supp.3d 1356 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (Negative material injury determination in countervailing duty investigation was reasonable) Text

Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat, JSC v. U.S., 58 F.Supp.3d 1397 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (Department of Commerce reasonably determined that content of importer’s product fell within scope of antidumping duty order) Text

Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 71 F.Supp.3d 1338 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (importer’s lack of bona fide sales premium warranted rescission of new shipper review under antidumping duty order) Text

Vinh Hoan Corp. v. U.S., 49 F.Supp.3d 1285 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2015) (relative economic comparability of potential surrogate countries required analysis in selecting surrogate country in antidumping case) Text

Standard Furniture Mfg. Co., Inc. v. U.S., 37 F.Supp.3d 1365 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (domestic producer’s conduct supporting antidumping petition did not override written opposition) Text

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. U.S., 34 F.Supp.3d 1386 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (statute limiting distribution of antidumping duties did not violate First Amendment) Text

Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. U.S., 37 F.Supp.3d 1371 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (domestic producer was disqualified from sharing in antidumping duties) Text

Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 34 F.Supp.3d 1331 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (Commerce’s determination that entity that took title to goods after importation was an exporter was unreasonable) Text

Downhole Pipe & Equipment, LP v. U.S., 34 F.Supp.3d 1310 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (inventory changes did not indicate imminent threat to domestic producers warranting issuance of antidumping and countervailing duty orders) Text

Clearon Corp. v. U.S., 2014 WL 3643332 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (antidumping duty order; chlorinated isocyanurates)

Siemens Energy, Inc. v. U.S., 992 F.Supp.2d 1315 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (deference to affirmative injury determination arising from divided vote of International Trade Commission was warranted) Text

Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee v. U.S., 968 F.Supp.2d 1244 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (antidumping duty order; countervailing duty orders; aluminum extrusions) Text

Xiamen Intern. Trade and Indus. Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 953 F.Supp.2d 1307 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty order; preserved mushrooms) Text

Blue Field (Sichuan) Food Indus. Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 949 F.Supp.2d 1311 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty order; preserved mushrooms) Text

Downhole Pipe & Equipment, LP v. U.S., 963 F.Supp.2d 1335 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty order; countervailing duty order; steel drill pipe and steel drill collars) Text

Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 899 F.Supp.2d 1355 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty new shipper reviews; bona fide sale; honey) Text

Union Steel Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 896 F.Supp.2d 1330 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (zeroing in administrative antidumping reviews) Text

Link Snacks, Inc. v. U.S., 901 F.Supp.2d 1369 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States classification; beef jerky) Text

Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. U.S., 922 F.Supp.2d 1353 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (tariff classification; Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; beta-carotene products) Text

Zhejiang Native Produce & Animal By-Products Import & Export Corp. v. U.S., 2013 WL 2996235 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (critical circumstance determination; honey) Text

Taian Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 918 F.Supp.2d 1345 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty; garlic) Text

Catfish Farmers of America v. U.S., 2013 WL 3802168 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty new shipper reviews; Pangasius fish) Text

Clearon Corp. v. U.S., 2013 WL 646390 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty; chlorinated isocyanurates)

Thai Plastic Bags Industries Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 895 F.Supp.2d 1337 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (antidumping duty; polyethylene retail carrier bags) Text

Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 1730 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (antidumping duty; countervailing duty; coated paper) Text

R.T. Foods, Inc. v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 1637 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (Harmonized Tariff Schedule classification; tempura battered vegetable mixture) Text

Del Monte Corp. v. U.S., 730 F.3d 1352 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (Harmonized Tariff Schedule classification; tuna fish)

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 1206 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (countervailing duty investigation; multilayered wood flooring) Text

OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. U.S., 901 F.Supp.2d (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (antidumping; countervailing duty order; pneumatic OTR tires) Text

Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 451 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (antidumping; valuation of garlic) Text

Rack Room Shoes v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 211 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; tariff rates)

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 148 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (antidumping; Equal Access to Justice Act)

Grobest & I-Mei Indus. (Vietnam) Co. v. United States, 36 C.I.T. 98 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (antidumping; valuation of shrimp)

Nat. Fisheries Inst. v. U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Prot., 714 F. Supp.2d 1231 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2010) (bonding requirement on importers of shrimp products)  Text

GVD Food Co. v. United States, No. 09-00157, 2010 WL 3421963 (Ct. Int’l Trade Sept. 1, 2010) (antidumping order covering fish fillets from Vietnam)

Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria & Agricultura v. United States, 700 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2010) (antidumping duty order)  Text

Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. v. United States, 714 F.Supp.2d 1282 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2010) (antidumping; shrimp)  Text

Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. v. United States, 675 F.Supp.2d 1320 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2010) (challenging antidumping duty order)  Text

Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. v. United States, 647 F.Supp.2d 1368 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (antidumping; valuation of shrimp)  Text

Vinh Quang Fisheries Corp. v. United States, 637 F.Supp.2d 1352 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (valuation of unprocessed fish waste)  Text

Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States, 641 F.Supp.2d 1362 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (remanding to redetermining calculation of net price)  Text

Nat’l Fisheries Inst., Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Customs & Border Prot., 2009 WL 2599876 (Ct. Int’l Trade, 2009) (setting aside bond determination; bond for shrimp importers)  Text

Taian Ziyang Food Co. v. United States, 637 F.Supp.2d 1093 (Ct. Int’l Trade, 2009) (antidumping duty; factors of production in fresh garlic)  Text

Hacker v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., No. 047-00008, 2009 WL 1726369 (Ct. Int’l Trade June 19, 2009) (denial of trade adjustment assistance benefits)

S. Shrimp Alliance v. United States, 617 F.Supp.2d 1334 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (claim of improper distribution of CDSOA funds)   Text

Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. v. United States, 617 F.Supp.2d 1281 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2009) (challenging administrative review of antidumping duty on fresh garlic from China)  Text

Allied Pac. Food (Dalian) Co. v. United States, 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 130 (Ct. Int’l Trade Dec. 22, 2008) (antidumping duty investigation) Text

Colin Greenhouses v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 52 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 20, 2008) (trade adjustment assistance benefits)

Gilda Indus., Inc. v. United States, 556 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 14, 2008) (importer’s duties)  Text

Pat Huval Rest. & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. United States, 547 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Int’l Trade March 3, 2008) (affected domestic producers list)  Text

Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 17 (Ct. Int’l Trade Feb. 6, 2008) (trade adjustment assistance benefits)

Tropicana Prods. v. United States, 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 16 (Ct. Int’l Trade Feb. 5, 2008) (causation of injury to the domestic industry)

Dorsey v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 13 (Ct. Int’l Trade January 25, 2008) (trade adjustment assistance benefits reconsidered)

Seafood Exps. Ass’n of India v. United States, 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 7 (Ct. Int’l Trade Jan. 18, 2008) (notice pertaining to the bond directive)

Den Hoed v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 2008 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 6 (Ct. Int’l Trade Jan. 16, 2008) (trade adjustment assistance benefits) Text

Anderson v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 493 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (trade adjustment assistance benefits approved)  Text

O’Toole v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 471 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (trade adjustment assistance benefits denied)  Text

Valley Fresh Seafood, Inc. v. United States, 30 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1121 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (administrative review of an antidumping duty order contested)

Avecia, Inc. v. United States, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (protest jurisdiction)  Text

Native Fed’n of the Madre De Dios River & Tributaries v. Bozovich Timber Prods., 491 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (Endangered Species Act (ESA)  Text

Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 491 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (trade adjustment assistance)  Text

PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States ITC, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (First Amendment claims)  Text

Nevinnomysskiy Azot v. United States, 29 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA) 2352 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (revocation of antidumping duty)  Text

Jinan Yipin Corp. v. United States, 526 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (antidumping duty order)  Text

Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, 30 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1159 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (dumping margin)

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States, 429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (First Amendment)  Text

Native Fed’n of the Madre De Dios River & Tributaries v. Bozovich Timber Prods., 491 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (environmentalists asserted violation of CITES)  Text

Canadian Wheat Bd. v. United States, 491 F. Supp. 2d 1234 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (exception from liquidation of importer’s entries)  Text

PAM, S.p.A. v. United States, 495 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (antidumping administrative review)  Text

Allied Pac. Food (Dalian) Co. v. United States, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (final antidumping less-than-fair-value determination)  Text

Wooten v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 441 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (trade adjustment assistance)  Text

Nat’l Fisheries Inst., Inc. v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border Prot., 465 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (imposition of rigorous continuous bond requirements)  Text

Selivanoff v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 28 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA) 2085 (Ct. Int’l Trade July 25, 2006) (trade adjustment assistance cash benefits denied)

Lady Kelly, Inc. v. United States Secy. of Agric., 427 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (trade adjustment assistance)  Text

Cabana v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 427 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (trade adjustment assistance (TAA) benefits)  Text

Than Viet Do v. United States Secretary of Agriculture, 427 F. Supp. 2d 1224 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (Trade Adjustment Assistance)  Text

Desert Glory, Ltd. v. United States, 368 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (antidumping investigation notice)  Text

Hontex Enters. v. United States, 29 C.I.T. 1096 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (antidumping duty rate for two foreign exporters)  Text

Nufarm America’s, Inc. v. United States, 29 C.I.T. 1317, 1318 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (imposition of duties on merchandise imported under duty deferral programs)  Text

Tao Van Trinh v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 29 C.I.T. 1058 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (trade adjustment assistance benefits)  Text

Ingman v. United States Sec’y of Agric., 29 C.I.T. 1123 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (trade adjustment assistance benefits)

Int’l Labor Rights Fund v. United States, 29 C.I.T. 1050 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (imported cocoa produced by forced child labor)  Text

Int’l Custom Prods. v. United States, 29 C.I.T. 617 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (imposition of a rate advance contested)   Text

An Giang Agriculture and Food Import Export Company v. United States, 350 F.Supp.2d 1162 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (Dep’t of Commerce statutory authority)  Text

Huaiyang Hongda Dehydrated Vegetable Co. v. United States, 28 C.I.T. 1944 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (administrative review of the antidumping order)

Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co. v. United States, 28 C.I.T. 931 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (administrative review of the antidumping order)  Text

Pillsbury Co. v. United States, 28 C.I.T. 1418 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (U.S. Harmonized Tariff Sched. classification)   Text

Yancheng Baolong Biochemical Prods. Co. v. United States, 28 C.I.T. 578 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (administrative review of the antidumping order)  Text

Pillsbury Co. v. United States, 27 C.I.T. 1628 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2003) (drawback claims)  Text

Former Emples. of Galey & Lord Indus. v. Chao, 26 C.I.T. 806 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (trade adjustment assistance)  Text

Orleans Int’l v. United States, 26 C.I.T. 543 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985)  Text

Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United States Doc, 26 C.I.T. 494 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (review of antidumping duty)  Text

Ocean Harvest Wholesale, Inc. v. United States, 26 C.I.T. 358 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (first administrative review of the antidumping duty)

Kanematsu United States v. United States, 26 C.I.T. 137 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (agricultural use classifies the subject merchandise under Harmonized Tariff Sched. of the United States)  Text

Pac. Giant Inc. v. United States, 26 C.I.T. 894 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (antidumping duty order)  Text


 

FIRST CIRCUIT

Lluberes v. Uncommon Productions, — F.Supp.2d —-, 2010 WL 3245283 (D. Mass Aug. 16, 2010) (working conditions of Haitian sugarcane laborers)  Text

Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., Litig., 382 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D. Mass. 2004) (antitrust claims)  Text

Harvey v. Veneman, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18162 (D. Me. Oct. 10, 2003) (organic labeling)  Text


 

SECOND CIRCUIT

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 613 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2010) (importation of solid wood packing material)  Text

Boyd v. AWB Ltd., 544 F. Supp. 2d 236 (D.N.Y. 2008) (monopoly on wheat sold to Iraq)   Text

NRDC, Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40644 (D.N.Y. 2007) (environmental impact)


 

THIRD CIRCUIT

Intercitrus v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15427 (D. Pa. 2002) (import suspension order)


 

FOURTH CIRCUIT

Int’l Ctr. for Tech. Assessment v. Johanns, 473 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2007) (genetically engineered (GE) varieties of grasses)  Text

Md. Port Admin. v. Premier Auto. Servs. (In re Premier Auto. Servs.), 343 B.R. 501 (Bankr. D. Md. 2006) (bankruptcy and new lease)  Text

Hawai’i Orchid Growers Ass’n v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 436 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2006) (Endangered Species Act challenged)  Text

Banks v. Veneman, 402 F. Supp. 2d 43, 44 (D.D.C. 2005) (labor discrimination claims)  Text

Int’l Labor Rights Fund v. Bush, 357 F. Supp. 2d 204 (D.D.C. 2004) (imported cocoa produced by forced child labor)  Text


 

FIFTH CIRCUIT

Piazza’s Seafood World, LLC v. Odom, 448 F.3d 744 (5th Cir. 2006) (state labeling statute)  Text

Pat Huval’s Fisherman Wharf v. ITC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62678 (D. La. 2006) (“the Byrd Amendment”)


 

SIXTH CIRCUIT

Caviar v. United States Fish & Wildlife Servs., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100878 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 15, 2008) (exhaustion of administrative remedies)

Mich. Pork Producers Ass’n v. Veneman, 348 F.3d 157 (6th Cir. 2003) (First Amendment)  Text

Dailey v. Veneman, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24623 (6th Cir. Ohio Dec. 3, 2002) (plant and meat inspectation)


 

SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Nat’l Foreign Trade Council, Inc. v. Giannoulias, 523 F. Supp. 2d 731, 735 (N.D. Ill. 2007) (humanitarian exception for exports of ag. products to Sudan)  Text

Caterpillar Inc. v. Telescan Techs., L.L.C., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3477 (D. Ill. 2002) (trademark)


 

EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Schoenbaum v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24630 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 27, 2008) (monopoly)

Smithfield Foods, Inc. v. Miller, 241 F. Supp. 2d 978 (S.D. Iowa 2003) (facial discrimination against foreign interests)  Text

S.D. Farm Bureau v. Hazeltine, 2002 F.Supp.2d 1020 (D.S.D. 2002) (exclusion of foreign corporations from business)   Text


 

NINTH CIRCUIT

Martini E Ricci Iamino S.P.A.–Consortile Societa Agricola v. Western Fresh Marketing Services, Inc., 54 F.Supp.3d 1094 (E.D.Cal. 2014) (United Nations Convention of the International Sale of Goods did not apply to agreement between fruit producers and supplier) Text

Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape Comm’n, 546 F. Supp. 2d 859 (E.D. Cal. March 28, 2008) (First Amendment)  Text

Earth Island Inst. v. Hogarth, 484 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007) (fishery effects on dolphin conservation)  Text

Cactus Corner, LLC v. United States Dep’t. of Agric., 450 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. Cal. 2006) (import permission)  Text

United States ex rel. Huangyan Imp. & Exp. Corp v. Nature’s Farm Prods., 370 F. Supp. 2d 993 (D. Cal. 2005) (falsification of products’ country of origin)  Text

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of Am. v. USDA, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17360 (9th Cir. 2005) (import ban Final Rule determination)  Text

In re Wash. State Apple Adver. Comm’n, 257 F. Supp. 2d 1290, 1293 (E.D. Wash. 2003) (collection assessments)  Text

United States v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 229 F. Supp. 2d 1008 (D. Cal. 2002) (lockout affected the maritime industry)  Text

Charter v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 230 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (D. Mont. 2002) (maintenance and expansion of existing beef markets)  Text


 

TENTH CIRCUIT

U.S. Ex rel. Bahrani v. ConAgra, Inc., 624 F.3d 1275 (10th Cir. 2010) (fraudulent alteration of USDA export certificates for meat products)  Text


 

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Osorio v. Dole Food Company, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 713 (11th Cir. January 5, 2009) (recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment)

United States v. Norris, 452 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2006) (CITES sentencing)  Text

United States v. Panhandle Trading, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53698 (D. Fla. 2006) (false labeling)

Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc., 416 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. Fla. 2005) (labor dispute)  Text


 

D.C. CIRCUIT

Nat’l Corn Growers Ass’n v. E.P.A., 613 F.3d 266 (C.A. D.C. 2010) (EPA ban of carbofuran on domestic and imported food)  Text

Am. Cargo Transp. v. Natsios, 429 F. Supp. 2d 139 (D.D.C. 2006) (contract to a foreign flag ship)  Text

Castlewood Prods. v. Norton, 361 U.S. App. D.C. 151 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (Endangered Species Act)  Text


 

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Well Luck Company, Inc. v. United States, 887 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir 2018) (importer’s sunflower seed that were prepared for consumption were classified under HTSUS subheading covering fruit, nuts and other edible parts of plants) Text

Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. United States, 845 F.3d 1158 (D.C. Cir 2017) (Commerce failed to provide notice before withdrawal of targeted dumping regulation, in violation of Administrative Procedure Act (APA)) Text

Mid Continent Nail Corporation v. United States, 846 F.3d 1364 (D.C. Cir 2017) (bauxite proppants from China were classifiable as “aluminum ores and concentrates” under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) Text

Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. U.S., 786 F.3d 1354 (D.C. Cir 2015) (retroactive application of CDSOA provision that prohibited distributions of antidumping duties did not violate due process)

Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. U.S., 772 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir 2014) (importer’s beta-carotene product was classifiable as provitamins unmixed)  Text

Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co., Ltd. v. U.S., 766 F.3d 1378 (D.C. Cir 2014) (best available information consisted of prices on largest grade of non-contemporaneous whole garlic bulbs)

R.T. Foods, Inc. v. U.S., 757 F.3d 1349 (D.C. Cir 2014) (Entries were classifiable under HTSUS provision for prepared mixed vegetables)

Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. U.S., 751 F.3d 1371 (D.C. Cir 2014) (Commerce’s exclusion of surrogate financial statements was reasonable on redetermination of antidumping duty claim) Text

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. U.S., 734 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir 2013) (Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act; Affected Domestic Producers) Text

PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. U.S. Intern. Trade Com’n, 684 F.3d 1374 (D.C. Cir 2012) (qualification as affected domestic producer; Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act)

Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria and Agricultura v. U.S., 36 C.I.T. 656 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (antidumping; valuation of orange juice)

Aromont USA, Inc. v. U.S., 671 F.3d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) Text

Hacker v. United States, 613 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (denial of application for trade adjustment assistance cash benefits)  Text

Aectra Ref. & Mktg., Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (untimely claim for drawback on import fees)  Text

Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. February 25, 2008) (NAFTA Implementation Act)  Text

Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Comm. v. United States, 515 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. February 15, 2008) (antidumping investigation and the final scope determination)  Text

Bourdeau Bros. v. ITC, 444 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (trademarks)  Text

Steen v. United States, 468 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (“trade adjustment assistance” cash benefit)  Text

Gilda Indus. v. United States, 446 F.3d 1271 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (USTR’s compilation and administration of WTO retaliation list challenged)  Text

Zhejiang Native Produce & Animal By-Products Imp. & Exp. Corp. v. United States, 432 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (retroactive antidumping duty)  Text

Grandits v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 519 (Fed. Cl. 2005) (liability for overtime)

Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United States, 322 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (dumping duty margin)  Text

In re Les Halles de Paris J.V., 334 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (diceptive trademark)  Text

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth, 330 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (challenging administrative determinations)  Text

Orleans Int’l, Inc. v. United States, 334 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (Beef Promotion and Research Act)  Text

Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. United States, 301 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (harbor maintenance tax (HMT))  Text


 

CALIFORNIA

Sea Foods Co., Ltd. v. O.M. Foods Co., Ltd., 150 Cal. App. 4th 769 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) (fraud)  Text