Case Law Index Administrative Law

January 1, 2002 – November 26, 2019

 

This index provides a comprehensive though not necessarily exhaustive compilation of reported and unreported federal and state court decisions involving Administrative Law that were decided between the dates listed above.  The cases are listed in reverse chronological order. The “Text” link goes to the freely available Google Scholar text of the opinion.  These listings are for educational purposes only, and are not a substitute for legal counsel.


SUPREME COURT

PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 2051 (2019) (challenging validity of an Order)

Food Mktg. Inst. v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S. Ct. 2356 (2019) (action for FIOA request seeking SNAP data)

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 361 (2018) (action challenging Fish and Wildlife Service’s designation of their land) Text

Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U.S. 139 (2010) (suit brought under APA) Text

Wilkie v. Robbins, 551 U.S. 537 (2007) (intimidation to extract easement by BLM; Blevins damages) Text

Franconia Assocs. v. United States, 536 U.S. 129 (2002) (violation of the Tucker Act and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause) Text


FIRST CIRCUIT

Nasuti ex rel. U.S. v. Savage Farms, Inc., No. CIV.A. 12-30121-GAO, 2014 WL 1327015, at *1 (D. Mass. Mar. 27, 2014), aff’d sub nom. Nasuti v. Savage Farms Inc., No. 14-1362, 2015 WL 9598315 (1st Cir. Mar. 12, 2015) (action under the FCA)

Martex Farms, S.E. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 559 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2009) (review of agency decision finding FIFRA violations)   Text

United States v. Alfonzo-Reyes, 410 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.P.R. 2006) (conspiracy to defraud)

Padro-Perez v. United States, No. CIV. 04-1229 (PG), 2006 WL 1451519, at *1 (D.P.R. May 19, 2006) (FSA loan qualification denial)


SECOND CIRCUIT

PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 2051 (2019) (using APA t challenge orders validity)

Robbins v. New York Corn & Soybean Growers Ass’n, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 3d 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2017) (violations of FOIA and federal question) Text

Al Amin Halal Meat & Fish Mkt. Inc. v. United States, No. 15CV276A, 2015 WL 12552019, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2015), report and recommendation adopted, No. 15-CV-276A, 2015 WL 12552031 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2015) (APA as basis of review)

Friends of Animals v. Clay, No. 13-CV-7293 JG, 2014 WL 4966122, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2014), aff’d, 811 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2016) (action under APA) Text

Fountain v. United States, No. 3:14-CV-964 NAM/RFT, 2014 WL 4327334, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2014) (seeking relief under the APA) Text

Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin., 872 F. Supp. 2d 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), rev’d, 760 F.3d 151 (2d Cir. 2014) (violation of the APA) Text

Dovid v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 11 CIV. 2746 PAC, 2013 WL 775408, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2013), aff’d sub nom. Congregation Machna Shalva Zichron Zvi Dovid v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 557 F. App’x 87 (2d Cir. 2014) (violation of the APA)

Paganini v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric. Sec’y of Agric., No. 12 CV 4615 VB, 2012 WL 6822150, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2012) (alleging subject matter jurisdiction under the APA)

Laudadio v. Johanns, 677 F.Supp.2d 590 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (administrative remedies were exhausted allowing for discrimination suit to proceed)   Text

Natural Res. Def. Council v. EPA, No. 09 Civ. 4317(DLC), 2009 WL  5033959 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2009) (failure to provide notice and comment) Text

Conyers v. Rossides, 558 F.3d 137 (2d Cir. 2009) (failure to hire applicant is not reviewable under the APA) Text

Liberty Shipping Grp. LLC v. United States, No. 09-CV-3161 ENV/VVP, 2009 WL 2390606, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. July 31, 2009) (alleging violations of the APA) Text

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. E.P.A., 581 F.Supp. 2d 491 (S.D. N.Y. 2008) (granting FIOA fee waiver) Text

Star Growers v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 04-CV-0742E(Sr), 2006 WL 2134640 (W.D. N.Y. July 28, 2006) (application of the EAJA)

AG-Innovations, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:02CV332, 2006 WL 462580, at *1 (D. Vt. Feb. 24, 2006) (appealing administrative order, APA)

Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 399 F.3d 486 (2d Cir. 2005) (challenge of CAFO rule) Text


THIRD CIRCUIT

Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 475 F. App’x 438 (3d Cir. 2012) (standard of review under the APA)

4900 S. Broad St. Assocs.-Tenant, L.P. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. CIV.A. 8-4646, 2009 WL 301936, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2009) (jurisdiction under the APA)

4900 S. Broad St. Assocs.-Tenant, L.P. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. CIV.A 8-4646, 2009 WL 153810, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2009) (APA violation)

Chiang v. Schafer, No. CIV. A. 2000-04, 2008 WL 3925260, at *1 (D.V.I. Aug. 20, 2008), aff’d sub nom. Virgin Island Class Plaintiffs v. Vilsack, 362 F. App’x 252 (3d Cir. 2010) (violation of the APA)

Baiardi Food Chain v. United States, 482 F.3d 238 (3d Cir. 2007) (review under the APA) Text 

United States v. Nour Halal Meat Distrib., Inc., 505 F. Supp. 2d 275 (W.D. Pa. 2007) (Subpoena authority of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994)  Text

Marslette v. Glickman, No. CIV.A. 00-816-SLR, 2003 WL 1697535 (D. Del. Mar. 26, 2003) (standard of review under the APA)

Chiang v. Veneman, 213 F.R.D. 256 (D.V.I. 2003), opinion aff’d in part, vacated in part, 385 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2004) (discrimination claim under the APA) Text


FOURTH CIRCUIT

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 194 F. Supp. 3d 404 (E.D.N.C. 2016), aff’d sub nom. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 861 F.3d 502 (4th Cir. 2017) (alleging violation of APA) Text

Davis v. Vilsack, No. 7:13CV00026, 2014 WL 2547746, at *1 (W.D. Va. June 5, 2014) (challenging decision that terminated contracts) Text

Am. Whitewater v. Tidwell, 770 F.3d 1108 (4th Cir. 2014) (challenging forest management plan) Text

Am. Whitewater v. Tidwell, 959 F. Supp. 2d 839 (D.S.C. 2013), aff’d, 770 F.3d 1108 (4th Cir. 2014) (challenging forest management plan) Text

United States v. Rinaudo, No. 2:09-MJ-1149-BO, 2009 WL 358990 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2010) (prohibition on nudity not unconstitutional in wildlife refuge)

Harrell & Owens Farm v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., No. 4:09-CV-217-FL, 2010 WL 9462574, at *1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2010), aff’d, 471 F. App’x 141 (4th Cir. 2012) (judicial review of the final agency) Text

Tyson v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 360 F. App’x 451 (4th Cir. 2010) (judicial review of returning overpayment)

Dow AgroSciences LLC v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 638 F.Supp.2d 508 (D. Md. 2009) (biological opinion taken in regards to pesticide application process)  Text

N.C. Growers’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Solis, 644 F.Supp.2d 664 (M.D.N.C. 2009) (injunction to prevent agency rule from taking effect)  Text

Tyson v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 589 F.Supp.2d 584(E.D. N.C. 2008) (review of agency final decision)  Text

Lanco Dairy Farms Coop. v. Sec’y of Agric., 572 F.Supp.2d 633 (D. Md. 2008) (review of Secretary’s interpretation of AMA)  Text

U.S. ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist., 528 F.3d 292 (4th Cir. 2008) (False Claims Act)  Text

Abingdon Livestock Exch., Inc. v. Smith, No. 1:06CV00096, 2007 WL 3146504 (W.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007) (primary jurisdiction)  Text

Holly Hill Farm Corp. v. U.S., 477 F.3d 258 (4th Cir. 2006) (arbitrary and capricious)

Hill v. Courter, 344 F.Supp.2d 484 (E.D. Va. 2004) (abstention of federal court)  Text

Neese v. Johanns, No. Civ.A.1:05CV00071, 2006 WL 1169800 (W.D. Va. May 2, 2006) (class certification to challenge Sec’y’s tobacco buyout rules)

McDaniels v. U.S., 300 F.3d 407 (4th Cir. 2002) (denial of disaster relief)  Text


FIFTH CIRCUIT

Texas Retailers Ass’n v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. 01:18-CV-659-LY, 2018 WL 6431895, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2018) (attempt to block confidential information from release)

Adkins v. Silverman, 899 F.3d 395 (5th Cir. 2018) (judicial review of a final decision) Text

Adkins v. Vilsack, 252 F. Supp. 3d 588 (N.D. Tex. 2017), aff’d sub nom. Adkins v. Silverman, 899 F.3d 395 (5th Cir. 2018) (judicial review of a final decision) Text

Texas v. United States, 787 F.3d 733 (5th Cir. 2015) (violation of  APA notice-and-comment requirements)Text

Louisiana Sportsmen All., LLC v. Vilsack, No. 12-CV-2929, 2013 WL 12182156, at *1 (W.D. La. Sept. 4, 2013) (seeks review of the USDA’s action pursuant to the APA)

Adams v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. CIVA3:07CV612HTWLRA, 2010 WL 1374898, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 31, 2010) (subject matter jurisdiction under APA)

Magee v. United States Through Dep’t of Agric., Farm Serv. Agency, No. CV 3:06-541 HTW-LRA, 2008 WL 11439401, at *1 (S.D. Miss. July 18, 2008), aff’d sub nom. Magee v. United States, 342 F. App’x 19 (5th Cir. 2009) (challenging Farm Service Agency decision)

Magee v. United States, No. 09-60009, 2009 WL 2169057 (5th Cir. July 20, 2009) (review of NAD decision)

M.J. Farms, Ltd. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 593 F. Supp. 2d 907 (W.D. La. 2008) (challenging cancellation of hunting lease on farmland) Text

Dawson Farms, LLC v. Farm Serv. Agency, 504 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 2007) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies)  Text

Barrientos v. U.S., No. L-05-163, 2006 WL 2414348 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2006) (breach of contract)

Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Dep’t of Agric., 164 F. App’x 528 (5th Cir. 2006) (challenges the “Batter-Coating Rule”)

City of Coll. Station v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 395 F. Supp. 2d 495 (S.D. Tex. 2005) (enjoin USDA from funding loan to rural water association) Text

Fleming Cos., Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 322 F.Supp.2d 744 (E.D. Tex. 2004) (validity of final rule)  Text

Brown v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 67 F. App’x 241, 2003 WL 21108492 (5th Cir. 2003) (due process)

Davidson v. Veneman, 317 F.3d 503 (5th Cir. 2003) (denial of attorney’s fees under the EAJA, denial of interest under the Prompt Payment Act)  Text

Rain & Hail Ins. Serv., Inc. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 229 F. Supp. 2d 710 (S.D. Tex. 2002) (challenging FCIC decision to withhold payment) Text


SIXTH CIRCUIT

Lea v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. 16-00735, 2018 WL 721381, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018), aff’d, No. 18-5535, 2019 WL 2246555 (6th Cir. Feb. 5, 2019), cert. denied sub nom. Lea v. Perdue, 139 S. Ct. 2028 (2019) (alleged failure to protect Petitioner from foreclosure)

Sunrise Coop., Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 261 F. Supp. 3d 850 (N.D. Ohio 2017), rev’d, 891 F.3d 652 (6th Cir. 2018) (action under the APA challenging decision of USDA’s Risk Management Agency) Text

Lea v. United States Departure of Agric., No. 3:16-CV-00735, 2017 WL 8890263, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2017), report and recommendation adopted sub nom. Lea v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. 16-00735, 2018 WL 721381 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018), aff’d, No. 18-5535, 2019 WL 2246555 (6th Cir. Feb. 5, 2019), cert. denied sub nom. Lea v. Perdue, 139 S. Ct. 2028 (2019) (Judicial Review under the APA)

Alhalemi, Inc. v. Roberts United States of Am., 224 F. Supp. 3d 587 (E.D. Mich. 2016) (violations of due process and the APA) Text

Aui Mgmt. LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. CV 2:11-0121, 2015 WL 8346748, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 8, 2015), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:11-0121, 2016 WL 465485 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 8, 2016) (judicial review of the suspension pursuant to the APA)

Kubacki v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric.–Farm Serv. Agency, No. 12-15142, 2013 WL 2319336, at *1 (E.D. Mich. May 28, 2013) (administrative challenge seeking reinstatement to county committee)

Stewart v. Fed. Crop. Ins. Corp., No. 4:09-cv-101, 2010 WL 3341863 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 25, 2010) (review of appeals under the Administrative Procedure Act)

Forest Serv. Employees for Envtl. Ethics v. U.S. Forest Serv., 689 F. Supp. 2d 891 (W.D. Ky. 2010) (judicial review under APA) Text

Nat’l Cotton Council of Am. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 553 F.3d 927 (6th Cir. 2009) (Chevron deference not extended to agency interpretation)  Text

Meister v. Sec’y, U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 07-CV-13008-DT, 2009 WL 10680128, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 30, 2009), aff’d in part, rev’d in part and remanded sub nom. Meister v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 623 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2010) (seeking judicial review under the APA)

Cleary v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 07-11940, 2008 WL 4427533 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2008) (review of administrative appeals’ process)

Estate of Henegar v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 2:07-CV-183, 2008 WL 3540066, at *1 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 11, 2008) (seeking declaratory judgement for TTPP payments)

First Tennessee Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Johanns, 618 F. Supp. 2d 778 (M.D. Tenn. 2008)( seeking judicial review of Secretary’s determination of lender’s liabilities) Text

Estate of Henegar v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 2:07-CV-183, 2008 WL 3540066 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 11, 2008) (attorney’s fees under EAJA)

Lacy v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 07-3961, 2008 WL 2178099 (6th Cir. May 22, 2007) (substantial evidence)

First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Johanns, 618 F.Supp.2d 778 (M.D. Tenn. 2008) (Secretary’s decision that lender failed to comply not arbitrary and capricious)   Text

Hendrick v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:06-CV-80(M), 2007 WL 2900526 (W.D. Ky Oct. 1, 2007) (USDA interpretation of “Scar Rule”)

Durbin v. Farm Serv. Agency, No. C2:05-CV-566, 2007 WL 1114986 (S.D. Ohio April 13, 2007) (NRCS used proper procedures in wetland delineation)  Text

Morrow v. Hoskins, No. CIV.A. 6:06-97-DCR, 2006 WL 1371587 (E.D. Ky. May 16, 2006) (remedies and injunctive relief under the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994)

Johnson County Comm. for Clean Air & Water v. EPA, No. 3:05-0222, 2005 WL 2204953 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 9, 2005) (compelled agency action)

Fullenkamp v. Veneman, 383 F.3d 478 (6th Cir. 2004) (agency’s interpretation reasonable)  Text

Donaldson v. U.S., 268 F.Supp.2d 812 (E.D. Mich. 2003) (arbitrary and capricious, agency discretion)  Text

James v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 3:01-CV-628, 2003 WL 24135441, at *1 (E.D. Tenn. Sept. 22, 2003) (judicial review of a final determination by the NAD)

Reinhart v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 39 F. App’x. 954 (6th Cir. 2002) (untimely appeal)


SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Mittelstadt v. Perdue, 913 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2019) (denial of application to reenroll land in the CRP violated the APA) Text

Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 912 F.3d 455 (8th Cir. 2018) (review of orders from USDA that withdrew interim final rule governing competition between stockyards and stockyard dealers)Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 884 F.3d 795 (7th Cir. 2018) (challenging of appointment of candidate) Text

PM Farms, Inc. v. Young, 233 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Iowa 2017) (review of final determination by NAD) Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1061 (W.D. Wis. 2017), aff’d, 884 F.3d 795 (7th Cir. 2018) (challenging of appointment of candidate)Text

Talley v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 595 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2010), reh’g en banc granted, opinion vacated (June 10, 2010), on reh’g en banc, No. 09-2123, 2010 WL 5887796 (7th Cir. Oct. 1, 2010) (alleging that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by incorrectly reporting that borrower was delinquent on his loan) Text

Smith v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 888 F. Supp. 2d 945 (S.D. Iowa 2012) (action against USDA following its decision to close a Farm Service Agency office) Text

Cent. Platte Nat. Res. Dist. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 643 F.3d 1142 (8th Cir. 2011) (seeking disclosure, under FOIA and APA, of geospatial data related to farmland)Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric. 560 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2009) (FIOA request rendered moot by production of documents)  Text

White Eagle Coop Ass’n v. Conner, 553 F.3d 467 (7th Cir. 2009) (challenging regulation decision and rule for milk marketing order)  Text

Donham v. U.S. Forest Serv., No. 07-CV-111-MJR, 2008 WL 5221102 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 12, 2008) (FOIA request moot)

Edwards v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 584 F.Supp.2d 595(W.D. N.Y. 2008) (review of agency order to reimburse benefits)  Text

Widtfeldt v. Schafer, 290 F. App’x 963 (8th Cir. 2008) (injunctive relief under the APA and challenging USDA order)

Wiese v. Cmty. Bank of Cent. Wis., No. 08-cv-272-bbc, 2008 WL 4756679 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 28, 2008) (no final agency action)

Five Points Rd. Joint Venture v. Johanns, 542 F.3d 1121 (7th Cir. 2008) (NAD denial of EAJA claims)  Text

White Eagle Coop. Ass’n v. Johanns, 508 F.Supp.2d 664 (N.D. Ind. 2007) (upholding agency rulemaking)  Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 06-C-0182-C, 2007 WL 5414894 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 21, 2007) (production of documents, attorney’s fees under the Freedom of Information Act)

Buchholz v. Rural Cmty. Ins. Co., No. 05C0115C, 2005 WL 1711153 (W.D. Wis. July 20, 2005) (exhaustion of remedies)

White Eagle Co-op. Ass’n v. Johanns, 396 F. Supp. 2d 954 (N.D. Ind. 2005) (upheld Order without following proper administrative procedures) Text

Raber v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 304CV0199RLYWGH, 2005 WL 1569463 (S.D. Ind. June 30, 2005) (application of EAJA)

Horn Farms v. Johanns, 397 F.3d 472 (7th Cir. 2005) (Swampbuster exemption)  Text

Horn Farms, Inc. v. Veneman, 319 F. Supp. 2d 902 (N.D. Ind. 2004), rev’d sub nom. Horn Farms, Inc. v. Johanns, 397 F.3d 472 (7th Cir. 2005) (seeking review of decision to terminate operator from farm subsidy programs) Text

Shawnee Trail Conservancy v. Nicholas, 343 F. Supp. 2d 687 (S.D. Ill. 2004) (challenging court order that bans all ATV’s in National Forests) Text

Habitat Educ. Ctr., Inc. v. Bosworth, 221 F.R.D. 488 (E.D. Wis. 2004) (alleging that logging activities and timber sales in national forest violated NEPA, NFMA, and APA)

Alto Dairy v. Veneman, 336 F.3d 560 (7th Cir. 2003) (judicial review, adequate notice)  Text


EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Davids as Tr. of Harold D. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 367 F. Supp. 3d 880 (N.D. Iowa 2019) (judicial review of final decision of the USDA determining wetland conversion activity on the farm) Text

Franconia Minerals (US) LLC v. United States, 319 F.R.D. 261 (D. Minn. 2017) (asserting claims under the Quiet Title Act and the Administrative Procedure Act)

Foster v. Vilsack, 820 F.3d 330 (8th Cir. 2016) (challenging the determination by the USDA that portion of owner’s farmland was protected wetland) Text

Midland Farms, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 35 F. Supp. 3d 1056 (D.S.D. 2014) (seeking judicial review under the APA of FCIC’s policy interpretations in arbitration) Text

Dawson Farms v. Risk Mgmt. Agency, 698 F.3d 1079 (8th Cir. 2012) (challenging RMA’s denial of a claim for loss due to rot in their stored potatoes) Text 

Syverson v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 601 F.3d 793 (8th Cir. 2010) (cease and desist order)Text

B&S Farms of Kasson, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 08-CV-5827 PJS/JJK, 2009 WL 2998551 (D. Minn. Sept. 15, 2009) (agency applying the improper standard; laches not a defense against the government)  Text

Arnegard v. Feilmeier, No. 4:08-CV-083, 2009 WL 2590536 (D.N.D. Aug. 19, 2009) (review of NAD proceedings)

Carter v. High Country Mercantile, Inc., No. 08-0835-CV-W-ODS, 2009 WL 2244753 (W.D. Mo. July 28, 2009) (agency could prevent employees from testify or producing documents to protect agency’s privilege)  Text

B&D Land & Livestock Co. v. Schafer, 615 F.Supp.2d 950 (N.D. Iowa 2009) (awarding attorney’s fees under the EAJA)  Text

Keating v. Neb. Pub. Power Dist., 562 F.3d 923 (8th Cir. 2009) (exhaustion of remedies not required to bring due process claim)  Text

B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Schafer, 584 F.Supp.2d 1182 (N.D. Iowa 2008) (arbitrary and capricious wetlands determination)  Text

Anderson v. Farm Serv. Agency of U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 534 F.3d 811 (8th Cir. 2008) (denial of crop disaster assistance payments)  Text

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 566 F.Supp.2d 995 (D. S.D. 2008) (preliminary injunction to prevent implementation of final rule)  Text

Wolfhole, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:07CV73 CDP, 2008 WL 1805369 (E.D. Mo. April 17, 2008) (arbitrary and capricious denial of CSP application)

B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Veneman, 534 F.Supp.2d 891 (N.D. Iowa 2008) (granting a preliminary injunction against agency action)  Text

Dismuke v. Connor, Nos. 05-CV-1003, 05-CV-1004, 2007 WL 4463567 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 14, 2007) (discrimination in farm loan processing)

Anderson v. Farm Serv. Agency, 502 F.Supp.2d 924 (D. Minn. 2007) (substantial evidence)  Text

Widtfeldt v. Johanns, No. 8:05CV49, 2006 WL 8448853, at *1 (D. Neb. Dec. 11, 2006) (seeking judicial review of a final agency determination by the NAD)

Ballanger v. Johanns, 451 F.Supp.2d 1061 (S.D. Iowa 2006), aff’d, 495 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 2007) (failure to exhaust remedies, Chevron deference to agency)  Text

Ace Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 440 F.3d 992 (8th Cir. 2006) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Barnes v. U.S., 448 F.3d 1065 (8th Cir. 2006) (FSIS tort immunity)  Text

Barger v. Johanns, No. 4:04CV3268, 2006 WL 680889, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14331 (D. Neb. Mar. 13, 2006) (farm program eligibility)

Miller v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 2:06CV0004MLM, 2006 WL 2038631, at *1 (E.D. Mo. July 19, 2006) (judicial review under APA) Text

Clason v. Johanns, 438 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2006) (marketing assistance loan rate)  Text

Davies v. Johanes(sic), 409 F.Supp.2d 1150 (W.D. Mo. 2006), rev’d 477 F.3d 968 (8th Cir. 2007) (shared appreciation recapture)  Text

Mages v. Johanns, 431 F.3d 1132 (8th Cir. 2005) (payment limitations)  Text

Rain & Hail Ins. Serv., Inc. v. Fed. Crop. Ins. Corp., 426 F.3d 976 (8th Cir. 2005) (reisurance)  Text

Siebrasse v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 418 F.3d 847 (8th Cir. 2005) (upholding agency decision)  Text

Mitchell v. Johanns, 400 F.Supp.2d 1133 (S.D. Iowa 2005) (affirming NAD decision to hold joint and severally liable for payment scheme)  Text

Rosenau v. Farm Serv. Agency, 395 F.Supp.2d 868 (D. N.D. 2005) (NRCS did not follow proper procedures)  Text

Neb. Beef, Ltd. v. Greening, 398 F.3d 1080 (8th Cir. 2005) (Bivens remedy availability)  Text

Ace Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp. & Risk Mgmt. Agency, 357 F.Supp.2d 1140 (S.D. Iowa 2005) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Sierra Club v. Bosworth, 352 F.Supp.2d 909 (D. Minn. 2005) (supplementing record; exhaustion of remedies; appropriateness of agency action; agency compliance with regulation)  Text

Anderson v. Farm Serv. Agency of U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 04-2971ADMAJB, 2004 WL 2674157 (D. Minn. Nov. 23, 2004) (exhaustion of remedies, agency expertise)  Text

B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Veneman, 332 F.Supp.2d 1200 (N.D. Iowa 2004) (wetland determination is subject to administrative appeal)  Text

Iowa Citizens for Cmty. Improvement v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 256 F.Supp.2d 946 S.D. Iowa 2002) (granting FIOA request)  Text

Branstad v. Veneman, 232 F.Supp.2d 945 (N.D. Iowa 2002) (denial of attorney’s fees under EAJA)  Text

B & D Land & Livestock Co. v. Veneman, 231 F.Supp.2d 895 (N.D. Iowa 2002) (granting preliminary injunction to keep eligible for farm program)   Text

In re 2000 Sugar Beet Crop Ins. Litig. 2002, 228 F.Supp.2d 999 (D. Minn. 2002), rev’d sub nom. Nat. Crop Ins. Serv., Inc. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 351 F.3d 346 (8th Cir. 2003) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Kuster v. Veneman, 226 F.Supp.2d 1190 (D. N.D. 2002) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Lane v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 294 F.3d 1001 (8th Cir. 2002) (attorneys’ fees under EAJA)  Text

Branstad v. Veneman, 212 F.Supp.2d 976 (N.D. Iowa 2002) (vacating denial of administrative appeal)  Text

Bukaske v. U.S. Dep’t of Agr., 2002 DSD 5, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1162 (D.S.D. 2002) (judicial review of requirement to pay shared appreciation to FSA) Text


NINTH CIRCUIT

Anato v. United States Dep’t of Agric., Rural Dev., No. CV-17-28-GF-BMM-JTJ, 2018 WL 3466950, at *1 (D. Mont. July 18, 2018) (seeking review of an order of the NAD) Text

Ctr. for Food Safety v. Perdue, 320 F. Supp. 3d 1101 (N.D. Cal. 2018), appeal dismissed, No. 18-16378, 2018 WL 5304837 (9th Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (challenging the process for certifying foods as “organic”) Text

Ctr. for Food Safety v. Vilsack, No. 15-CV-01590-HSG, 2016 WL 4698901 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2016) (challenging order by the Secretary) Text

Ctr. for Envtl. Health v. McCarthy, 192 F. Supp. 3d 1036 (N.D. Cal. 2016) (alleging violation of the APA) Text

Harmon v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 666 F. App’x 698 (9th Cir. 2016) (action under  APA challenging decision of FSA that farmer was ineligible for farm program payments)

Quick Korner Mkt. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Food & Nutrition Serv., 180 F. Supp. 3d 683 (S.D. Cal. 2016) (seeking judicial review of the agency’s decision to withdraw authorization from owners’ store to participate in food stamp program) Text

Noceti v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Risk Mgmt. Agency, No. 214CV01177KJMGGH, 2016 WL 304621, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2016), report and recommendation adopted sub nom. Noceti v. US Dep’t of Agric., No. 214CV01177KJMGGH, 2016 WL 4046978 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2016) (judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of final agency action relating to a federal crop insurance program)

Organized Vill. of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 795 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2015)( alleging that exemption of national forest from roadless rule violated the National Environmental Policy Act and APA) Text

Organized Vill. of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 746 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2014), on reh’g en banc, 795 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2015) (challenging Record of Decision which temporarily exempted Tongass National Forest from Roadless Rule) Text

Koshman v. Vilsack, 865 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (violation of the Swampbuster provisions) Text

Horne v. U.S. Dep’t of Agr., 395 F. App’x 486 (9th Cir. 2010) (seeking judicial review of dismissal of administrative petition)

Schroeder v. U.S., No. CV 08-1277 AC, 2010 WL 3222106 (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2010) (attorney’s fees pursuant to Equal Access to Justice Act)

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 08-01927, 2010 WL 3222183 (N.D. Cal. Aug 13, 2010) (action for attorney’s fees)

Oregon Natural Desert Ass’n v. Tidwell, — F.Supp.2d —-, 2010 WL 2246419 (D. Or. 2010) (challenge under the ESA and NFMA for grazing permits)

Buckingham v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 603 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit 2010) (failure to exhaust remedies)  Text

Fence Creek Cattle Co. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 602 F.3d 1125 (Ninth Circuit 2010), aff’g, No. 06-1236-SU, 2008 WL 89622 (D. Or. Jan. 7, 2008) (cancellation of grazing permit did not deprive plaintiff of due process rights under APA)  Text

Carlin v. Dairy Am., Inc., No. 1:09-CV-00430-AWI-DLB, 2010 WL 529436 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2010) (filed rate doctrine; raw milk)  Text

Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 593 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2010) (failure to keep map; challenges to boundary time-barred)  Text

Schroeder v. United States, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (D. Or. 2010) (compel enforcement of her interpretation of a final determination) Text

Horne v. USDA, No. CV-F-08-1549 LJO SMS, 2009 WL 4895362 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2009) (review of agency decision)  Text

Levine v. Vilsack, 587 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2009) (standing to challenge interpretive rule)  Text

Delano Farms Co. v. Calif. Table Grape Comm’n, No. 1:07-CV-1610 OWW SMS, 2009 WL 3586056 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2009) (violations of the APA)

Olsen v. United States, Nos. CV-08-5012-FVS, CV-08-5013-FVS, 2009 WL 3188423 (E.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2009) (jurisdiction of NAD)  Text

Cal. Trout v. FERC, 572 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2009) (upholding agency decision to deny attempts to intervene in renewal of license to operate dam)  Text

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 636 F. Supp. 2d 1081 (E.D. Cal. 2009) (administrative search; FIOA requests)  Text

Idaho Wool Growers Ass’n v. Schafer, 637 F.Supp.2d 868 (D. Idaho 2009) (final agency action; advisory committees)  Text

Ctr. For Biological Diversity v. Wagner, No. 08-302-CL, 2009 WL 21706049 (D. Or. June 20, 2009) (claim agency violated statutory duties when allowing grazing)

Geertson Seed Farms v. Johanns, 570 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2009) (upholding injunction for not complying with NEPA)  Text

Rookstool v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 3:06-CV-00499-LRH-VPC, 2009 WL 1684439 (D. Nev. June 12, 2009) (failure to show expert’s fees recoverable under EAJA)

W. Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 629 F.Supp.2d 951 (D. Ariz. 2009) (judicial review of claims under the APA)  Text

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 567 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2009) (withdrawal of policy by agency did not mean “prevailing party” for EAJA)  Text

Goat Ranchers of Or. v. Williams, No. 08-97-ST, 2009 WL 883581 (D. Or. Mar. 30, 2009) (standing to challenge Cougar Management Program)

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:08-CV-00358-OWW-SMS, 2009 WL 160283 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2009) (FOIA requests)

McGuire v. United States, 550 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2008) (exhaustion of remedies not required; jurisdiction under Tucker Act)  Text

Wildwest Inst. v. Rainville, No. CV07-466-S-EJL, 2008 WL 5220938 (D. Idaho Dec. 11, 2008) (exhaustion of remedies)

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Nos. C 05-1144 PJH, C 04-4512 PJH, 2008 WL 5210945 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008) (attorney’s fees under EAJA for successful NEPA challenge)  Text

Horne v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:08-CV-00402 OWW SMS, 2008 WL 4911438 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2008) (failure to file for judicial review within allowed time)

Californians for Humane Farms v. Schafer, No. C 08-03843 MHP, 2008 WL 4449583 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2008) (challenge to Egg Board’s budget)  Text

Easterday Ranches, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. CV-08-5067-RHW, 2008 WL 4426004 (E.D. Wash. Sept. 25, 2008) (denial of injunction to prevent implementation of final rules)

Rookstool v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric. No.3:06-CV-00499-LRH-VPC, 2008 WL 4167082 (D. Nev. Sept. 28, 2008) (EAJA; attorney’s fees)  Text

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:05-CV-00062 OWW-SMS, 2008 WL 3834271 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2008) (FOIA request)  Text

Levine v. Conner, 540 F.Supp.2d 1113 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (Chevron deference to agency’s interpretation)  Text

W. Watersheds Project v. Kraayenbrink, 538 F.Supp.2d 1302 (D. Idaho 2008) (agency failed to take hard look and was arbitrary and capricious in grazing permit regulations)  Text

Or. Natural Desert Ass’n v. Lohn, 522 F.Supp.2d 1295 (D. Or. 2007) (collection of attorney’s fees under EAJA)  Text

Ctr. for Food Safety v. Johanns, Civ. No. 03-00621 JMS/BMK, 2007 WL 3072860 (D. Haw. Oct. 18, 2007) (upholding EAJA award)  Text

Amalgamated Sugar Co. LLC v. Johanns, No. 06-167-S-EJL, 2007 WL 2612675 (D. Idaho Sept. 6, 2007) (Chevron deference to agency’s interpretation)

Stevens County v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 507 F.Supp.2d 1127 (E.D. Wash. 2007) (review of agency determination to limit grazing in federal forest)  Text

Aageson Grain & Cattle v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 500 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2007) (application of EAJA in a NAD proceeding)  Text

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of Am. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 499 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2007) (rulemaking did not violate APA)  Text

The Cloud Found., Inc. v. Kempthorne, No. CV 06 111 BLG RFC, 2007 WL 1876486 (D. Mont. June 27, 2007) (claim barred by statute of limitations)  Text

W. Watersheds Project v. Kraayenbrink, Nos. CV-05-297-E-BLW, CV-06-275-E-BLW, 2007 WL 1667618 (D. Idaho June 8, 2007) (agency did not take hard look at NEPA and required to consult with other agencies)  Text

Ctr. For Food Safety v. Johanns, CV. No. 03-00621 JMS-BMK, 2007 WL 3072863 (D. Haw. Apr. 19, 2007) (field testing of GMOs and compliance with ESA and NEPA)  Text

Or. Natural Desert Ass’n v. Lohn, 485 F.Supp.2d 1190 (D. Or. 2007) (agency’s decision was arbitrary and capricious)  Text

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S Dep’t of Agric., 231 F. App’x 565 (9th Cir. 2007) (Freedom of Information Act)

Geertson Farms, Inc. v. Johanns, No. C 06-01075 CRB, 2007 WL 518624 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2007) (not following proper NEPA procedures)  Text

Safe Air for Everyone v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 475 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2007) (EPA’s statutory interpretation was arbitrary and capricious)  Text

Or. Natural Desert Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 465 F.3d 977) (9th Cir. 2006) (final agency action under the APA)  Text

Ctr. for Food Safety v. Johanns, 451 F.Supp.2d 1165 (D. Haw. 2006) (permitting requirements for GMOs)  Text

Maughan v. Rosenkrance, No. CV-06-275-E-BLW, 2006 WL 2348077 (D.  Idaho Aug. 11, 2006) (enjoining new regulations that limited public participation)  Text

Geertson Farms, Inc. v. Johanns, 439 F.Supp.2d 1012 (N.D. Cal. 2006) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies)  Text

Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 450 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 2006) (risk level)  Text

W. Watersheds Project v. Secrist, No. CV 04 167 S BLW, 2009 WL 897718 (D. Idaho Mar. 31, 2006) (awarding of attorneys’ fees under EAJA)

Robbins v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 438 F.3d 1074 (10th Cir. 2006) (waiver of sovereign immunity by APA) Feb. 23, 2006  Text

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, No. C 05-01526 WHA, 2005 WL 1656881 (N.D. Cal. July 14, 2005) (compliance reporting)  Text

Clinger v. Farm Serv. Agency, No. CV 04 424 E BLW, 2006 WL 581192 (D. Idaho Mar. 8, 2006) (unreasonable interpretation of statute)

Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 346 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (E.D. Cal. 2004), aff’d, 450 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 2006) (challenging rule allowing, and setting conditions for, resumption of importation of Spanish clementines) Text

Vigel v. Leavitt, 381 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 2004) (review of final agency rule)  Text

Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund v. Veneman, No. 04-BLG-RFC, 2004 WL 1151970 (D. Mont. May 5, 2004) (challenge of mad cow regulation)

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 354 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2004) (Freedom of Information Act)  Text

Pauly v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 348 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2003) (exhaustion of remedies, recapture of appreciation)  Text

McBride Cotton & Cattle Corp. v. Veneman, 296 F.Supp.2d 1125 (D. Ariz. 2003) (agency authority, due process)  Text

Hemp Indus. Ass’n v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 333 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2003) (notice and comment)  Text

Ora Vaca, Inc. v. Norton, 55 Fed. App’x 433 (9th Cir. 2003) (company not a prevailing party under EAJA)

Idaho Sporting Cong., Inc. v. Rittenhouse, 305 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2002) (exhaustions of remedies)  Text

Robbins v. Wilkie, 300 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2002) (Bivens damages)  Text

McBride Cotton & Cattle Corp. v. Veneman, 290 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2002) (exhaustions of remedies)  Text


TENTH CIRCUIT

Puckett v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 692 F. App’x 964 (10th Cir. 2017) (judicial review of that decision under the APA)

Cure Land, LLC v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 833 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2016) (alleging violation of the APA) Text

Jarita Mesa Livestock Grazing Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 140 F. Supp. 3d 1123 (D.N.M. 2015) (challenging defendants’ decision to reduce number of grazing permits) Text

Jarita Mesa Livestock Grazing Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 58 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (D.N.M. 2014)( challenging ranger’s decision to reduce number of livestock grazing permits) Text

Jarita Mesa Livestock Grazing Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 61 F. Supp. 3d 1013 (D.N.M. 2014), amended in part, No. CIV. 12-0069 JB/KBM, 2015 WL 5138286 (D.N.M. Aug. 26, 2015) (alleging that 18% reduction in permits for cattle grazing within national forest violated their First Amendment) Text

Nat’l Ski Areas Ass’n, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 910 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (D. Colo. 2012)(judicial review) Text

Water Supply & Storage Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 910 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (D. Colo. 2012) (judicial review) Text

Strich v. United States, 793 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (D. Colo. 2011)( challenge road and trail designations) Text

McKeen v. U.S. Forest Serv., 615 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 2010)( seeking to have defendants’ cancellation of his permits set aside) Text

Wyatt Estate ex rel. Vaughn v. Vilsack, No. 09-1140-JTM , 2010 WL 2985981 (D. Kan. Jul 27, 2010) (denial of extension of CRP contracts)

Lackey v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 08-2117, 2010 WL 2543160 (10th Cir. June 25, 2010) (appeal on sanctions)

Reitz v. USDA, No. 08-4131-SAC, 2010 WL 786586 (D. Kan. Mar. 4, 2010) (violations of Privacy Act)  Text

Greater Yellowstone Coal. v. Tidwell, 572 F.3d 1115 (10th Cir. 2009) (no violation for rules authorizing federal lands to be used as elk feeding grounds)  Text

Smithfork Grazing Ass’n v. Salazar, 564 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2009) (final order can take effect before hearing on the  record)  Text

Stewart v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 554 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2009) (FOIA request over grazing permits granted and retired)  Text

Stewart v. Kempthorne, 554 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 2009) (review of agency decision to deny grazing permits; standing issues)  Text

W. Org. of Res. Councils v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 591 F.Supp.2d 1206 (D. Wyo. 2008) (agency decision was not arbitrary and capricious)  Text

Lackey v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. CV 07-842 JH/RLP, 2008 WL 11358868, at *1 (D.N.M. Feb. 21, 2008), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 07-842 JH/RLP, 2008 WL 11358907 (D.N.M. Mar. 28, 2008), aff’d sub nom. Lackey v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 384 F. App’x 741 (10th Cir. 2010) (judicial review)

Harts v. Johanns, 433 F.Supp.2d 1251 (D. Kan. 2006) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Gold Bank v. Johanns, No. 05-2239-JWL, 2005 WL 3536197 (D. Kan. Dec. 23, 2005) (denial of interest assistance application, jurisdiction)

Biller v. Veneman, 150 F. App’x 834 (10th Cir. 2005) (decision to terminate contract non-judicially reviewable)

Forest Guardians v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 416 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2005) (FOIA requests)  Text

Excel Corp. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 397 F.3d 1285 (10th Cir. 2005) (grading and pricing under PSA)  Text

Forest Guardians v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, No. CIV-02-1003 JB/WDS, 2004 WL 3426434 (D. N.M. Feb. 28, 2004) (claim for FOIA fee waiver)

Bishop v. Veneman, 283 F.Supp.2d 1207 (D. Kan. 2003) (challenge of FSA regulation)  Text

Payton v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 337 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2003) (judicial review)  Text

McKown v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 276 F.Supp.2d 1201 (D. N.M. 2003), aff’d 97 F. App’x 283 (10th Cir. 2004) (judicial review)  Text

Landry v. Smith, 58 F. App’x 439 (10th Cir. 439) (exhaustion of remedies)

Sanders Land & Cattle Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 49 F. App’x 211 (10th Cir. 2002) (upholding agency’s decision to deny application)

Dairy Producers of N.M. v. Veneman, 37 F. App’x 471 (10th Cir. 2002) (no violations of the non-delegation doctrine)


ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Lane v. United States, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1324 (S.D. Ga. 2018) (judicial review related to crop insurance claim) Text

Davis v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 687 F. App’x 824 (11th Cir. 2017) (judicial review of final decision)

Spring Creek Farming Co. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 653 F. App’x 728 (11th Cir. 2016) (judicial review of RMA final decision that its low yield was not covered loss under federal crop insurance program)

Alma Brightleaf, Inc. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 552 F. App’x 861 (11th Cir. 2013) (challenging denial of claim for indemnification for damage to tobacco crops)

FPL Food, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 671 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (S.D. Ga. 2009) (review of agency action under the APA) Text

Robinson v. Schafer, No. 7:07-CV-167(HL), 2008 WL 1995354 (M.D. Ga. May 6, 2008) (violations of EOCA)

McElmurray v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 535 F.Supp.2d 1318 (S.D. Ga. 2008) (reversing denial of “preventive planting” application)  Text

Am. Peanut Shellers Ass’n v. Johans, No. 4:06-CV-54 (CDL), 2007 WL 2460773 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 24, 2007) (lack of standing to challenge Sec’y’s interpretation)

Record Buck Farms, Inc. v. Johanns, 510 F.Supp.2d 868 (M.D. Fla. 2007) (failure to establish good cause to forgo notice and comment rulemaking)  Text

Mahon v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 485 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007) (arbitrary and capricious denial of crop assistance)  Text

Paradise Farms, Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. CV 304-181, 2006 WL 8433810, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 10, 2006) (judicial review of termination of contract)

London v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 410 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2005) (Chevron deference to Secretary)  Text


D.C. CIRCUIT

Organic Trade Ass’n v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 370 F. Supp. 3d 98 (D.D.C. 2019) (challenging the withdrawal of USDA rule) Text 

Cornucopia Inst. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. CV 16-148 (RC), 2018 WL 4637004 (D.D.C. Sept. 27, 2018) (action under the Freedom of Information Act) Text

Animal Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. Perdue, 346 F. Supp. 3d 153 (D.D.C. 2018) (judicial review)

Air Transp. Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 317 F. Supp. 3d 385 (D.D.C. 2018)( brought action challenging validity of rule issued by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) Text 

Bean v. Perdue, 316 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D.D.C. 2018) (alleging that USDA violated the APA) Text

Lillemoe v. United States Dep’t of Agric., Foreign Agric. Serv., 344 F. Supp. 3d 215 (D.D.C. 2018) (alleging FAS violated APA) Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 282 F. Supp. 3d 150 (D.D.C. 2017) (challenging agency’s response to FOIA request) Text

Animal Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. Vilsack, 237 F. Supp. 3d 15 (D.D.C. 2017) (judicial review of denial of claim) Text

Resolute Forest Prod., Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 219 F. Supp. 3d 69 (D.D.C. 2016) (alleging constitutional challenges to Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act)Text

Resolute Forest Prod., Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 130 F. Supp. 3d 81 (D.D.C. 2015)( alleging constitutional challenges to Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act) Text

Hunt v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 740 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2010) (alleging deprivation of just compensation) Text

Strunk v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, No. 10-0066(RJL), 2010 WL 4780845 (D. D.C. Nov. 24, 2010) (FOIA action seeking information on farmers against National Agricultural Statistics Service)

Benoit v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 608 F.3d 17 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (exhaustion of remedies and abuse of discretion)   Text

Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar, — F.Supp.2d —, 2010 WL 1140719 (D.D.C. 2010) (challenging bison and elk management plan)

Prime Time Int’l  Co. v. Vilsack, 599 F.3d 678 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (USDA interpretation not entitled to Chevron deference)  Text

Elliott v. USDA, 569 F.3d 842 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (request under FOIA)

In Def. of Animals v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 656 F.Supp.2d 68, (D.D.C. 2009) (failure of agency to show records were protected under FOIA exemption)  Text

Colo. Wild Horse & Burro Coal., Inc. v. Salazar, 639 F.Supp.2d 87 (D.D.C. 2009) (challenging agency decision to remove wild horses from herd area)

Poett v. United States, 657 F. Supp. 2d 230 (D.D.C. 2009) (seeking review of DSAT denial of request) Text

Ark. Dairy Coop. Ass’n, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 573 F.3d 815 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (producers could challenge interim rule under the APA) Text

Catawba County v. EPA, 571 F.3d 20 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (no APA violations in promulgation of NAAQS for fine particulate matter) Text

Koretoff v. Vilsack, 626 F.Supp.2d 4 (D.D.C. 2009) (failure to exhaust remedies)

Montanans for Multiple Use v. Barbouletos, 568 F.3d 225 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (claims that management of forest violated forest plan precluded)  Text

Garcia v. Vilsack, 563 F.3d 519 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (dismissal of APA failure to investigate claims)  Text

Hettinga v. United States, 560 F.3d 498 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (not requiring the exhaustion of remedies to challenge Milk Regulatory Equity Act)  Text

Nat’l Res. Def. Council v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 559 F.3d 561 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (rule’s preamble nonreviewable)  Text

Int’l Ctr. for Tech. Assessment v. Vilsack, 602 F.Supp.2d 228 (D. D.C. 2009) (attorney’s fees for successful NEPA challenge)  Text

Single Stick, Inc. v. Johanns, 601 F.Supp.2d 307 (D. D.C. 2009) (interpretation of Equitable Tobacco Reform Act)  Text

Koretoff v. Vilsack, 601 F.Supp.2d 238 (D. D.C. 2009) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies)  Text

Am. Farm Bureau Fed’n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 559 F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 24, 2009) (review of agency’s decision to revise air standards)  Text

Prosser v. Fed. Agric. Mortgage Corp., 593 F.Supp.2d 150 (D. D.C. 2009) (no violations of statutory or regulatory provisions by Farmer Mac)  Text

Short v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’r, 593 F.Supp.2d 69(D. D.C. 2009) (FOIA request; changing designation of wetlands)  Text

Swisher Int’l, Inc. v. Schafer, 550 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Tobacco Act of 2004 does not violate 5th Amendment)  Text

In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of Agriculture, 587 F.Supp.2d 178 (D.D.C. 2008) (exclusion of expert testimony, violations of Animal Welfare Act)  Text

Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, L.L.C. v. Dep’t of Agric., 539 F.3d 492 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (deference to agency’s denial of access to mad cow testing)  Text

Enter. Nat’l Bank v. Johanns, 539 F. Supp. 2d 343 (D.D.C. 2008), aff’d sub nom. Enter. Nat. Bank v. Vilsack, 568 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (seeking payment on loss of loan) Text

FMC Corp. v. U.S. E.P.A., 557 F.Supp.2d 105 (D. D.C. 2008) (challenge agency’s rules for the allocation of the burden of proof)  Text

Multi AG Media LLC v. Dep’t of Agric., 515 F.3d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Freedom of Information Act)  Text

Humane Soc’y of U.S. v. Johanns, 520 F.Supp.2d 8 (D. D.C. 2007) (final rule violated NEPA)  Text

Rice v. United States, 245 F.R.D. 3 (D. D.C. 2007) (violations of Privacy Act; releasing private information in FOIA request)

N.C. Fisheries Ass’n v. Gutierrez, 518 F.Supp.2d 62 (D. D.C. 2007) (upholding Sec’y decision)  Text

Ace Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 517 F.Supp.2d 391 (D. D.C. 2007) (agency authority to promulgate regulation)  Text

Cornucopia Inst. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 06-C-0182-C, 2007 WL 5414894 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 21, 2007) (production of documents, attorney’s fees under the Freedom of Information Act)

Haw. Orchid Growers Ass’n v. Johanns, 249 F. App’x. 204 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (final rule not arbitrary and capricious)

Love v. Connor, 525 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D.D.C. 2007), aff’d and remanded sub nom. Garcia v. Vilsack, 563 F.3d 519 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (discrimination claim against USDA) Text

Int’l Ctr. for Tech. Assessment v. Johanns, 473 F.Supp.2d 9 (D. D.C. 2007) (appropriateness of agency action)  Text

Edaleen Dairy, LLC v. Johanns, 467 F.3d 778 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (exhaustive of administrative remedies)  Text

Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. Kempthorne, 452 F.Supp.2d 71 (D. D.C. 2006) (grazing regulations did not violate other federal legislation)  Text

S. Cal. Edison Co. v. Fed. Energy Reg. Comm., 443 F.3d 94 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (energy purchase)  Text

Holly Sugar Corp. v. Veneman, 437 F.3d 1210 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (Chevron deference to agency’s interpretation of sugar loan interest rate)  Text

NW. Indep. Producers Ass’n v. Veneman, 312 F.Supp.2d 23 (D D.C. 2004) (judicial review; exhaustion of remedies)  Text

Avocados Plus, Inc. v. Veneman, 370 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text

La. Fed. Land Bank Ass’n v. Farm Credit Admin., 336 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (notice and comment)  Text

Hertzberg v. Veneman, 273 F.Supp.2d 67 (D. D.C. 2003) (Freedom of Information request)  Text

CropLife Am. v. E.P.A., 329 F.3d 876 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (notice and comment)  Text

Shaffer v. Veneman,325 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (jurisdiction)  Text

Rice v. United States, 211 F.R.D. 10 (D. D.C. 2002) (alleged violations of Privacy Act when personal information released in FOIA request)

Milk Train, Inc. v. Veneman, 310 F.3d 747 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (judicial review)  Text

Hershey Foods Corp. v. Dep’t of Agric., 293 F.3d 520 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (exhaustions of remedies)  Text

Sugar Cane Growers Co-op of Fla. v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 89 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (notice and comment)  Text


FEDERAL CIRCUIT

St. Bernard Par. Gov’t v. United States, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (breach of contract) Text

Active Network, LLC v. United States, 130 Fed. Cl. 421 (2017) (challenging contract award by USDA)

Nat’l Telecommuting Inst., Inc. v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 595 (2015) (challenging award of contract)

RLB Contracting, Inc. v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 750 (2014), aff’d, 621 F. App’x 1026 (Fed. Cir. 2015)(challenging award of contract)

Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, — Fed. Cl. —, 2010 WL 785395 (Fed. Cl. 2010) (EAJA attorney’s fees)

Acceptance Ins. Cos. v. United States, 583 F.3d 849 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (lack of cognizable property interest; claim of taking by agency)  Text

Tex. Bio- & Agro- Defense Consortium v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 798 (Fed. Cl. 2009) (challenging site selection for biosecurity facility)

Mendoza v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 331 (Fed. Cl. 2009) (remanding to agency to decide if plaintiffs where federal employees)

Sageman v. U.S., 82 Fed. Cl. 367 (Fed. Cl. 2008) (application of the Tucker Act)

Walker v. U.S., 79 Fed. Cl. 685 (Fed. Cl. 2008) (cancellation of regulatory permit was not a taking)

Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. U.S., 75 Fed. Cl. 527 (Fed. Cl. 2007) (finding regulatory taking)

Bruhn v. U.S., 74 Fed. Cl. 749 (Fed. Cl. 2006) (application of Tucker Act)

Evans v. U.S., 74 Fed. Cl. 554 (Fed. Cl. 2006), aff’d, 250 F. App’x 321 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (claim raisin marketing order was a regulatory taking)

Cotrell v. U.S., 71 Fed. Cl. 559 (Fed. Cl. 2006) (statute of limitations, exhaustion of remedies)

Goodrich v. United States, 434 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (final agency decision; accrual of statute of limitations)  Text

Star-Glo Assoc., LP v. U.S., 414 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (agency interpretation of statute)  Text

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S., 416 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (lack of jurisdiction over takings claim)

Gardner v. U.S., No. 04-1673C, 2005 WL 6112636 (Fed. Cl. June 13, 2005) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies)

Hall v. U.S., 69 Fed. Cl. 51 (Fed. Cl. 2005) (jurisdiction of settlement agreement)

Sartori v. U.S., 67 Fed. Cl. 263 (Fed. Cl. 2005) (temporary regulatory takings)

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S., 58 Fed. Cl. 391 (Fed. Cl. 2003) (regulatory takings claim)

Ace Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. U.S., 60 Fed. Cl. 175 (Fed. Cl. 2004) (exhaustion of remedies)

Lion Raisins, Inc. v. U.S., 57 Fed. Cl. 505 (Fed. Cl. 2003) (EAJA eligibility)


UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Hoed v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., No. 06-00446, 2008 WL 151353 (Ct. Int’l Trade Jan. 16, 2008) (supplementing the administrative record)

O’Toole v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., 471 F.Supp.2d 1323 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (supplementing the administrative record)  Text

Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., 469 F.Supp.2d 1326 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) (impermissible construction of statute)  Text

Anderson v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., 462 F.Supp.2d 1333 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006) (review of denial of benefits)  Text

Van Trinh v. U.S. Sec’y of Agric., 395 F.Supp.2d 1259 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005) (failure to make reasonable inquiry by agency)  Text


ARIZONA

Koepnick v. Ariz. State Land Dep’t, 212 P.3d 62 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) (reclassification of state land by state agency)


CALIFORNIA

Olson v. Cal. Dep’t of Pesticide Regulation, No. F056118, 2009 WL 2517644 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 19, 2009) (administrative procedures did not violate state’s APA)

Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Dep’t of Agric., No. A120874, 2008 WL 5423832 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2008) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies)

In re Farm Raised Salmon Cases, No. B182901a, 2008 WL 2070612 (Cal. Ct. App. May 16, 2008) (doctrine of primary jurisdiction)

Patterson Flying Serv. v. Cal. Dep’t of Pesticide Regulation, 74 Cal.Rptr.3d 290 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) (sufficient evidence to support agency finding and fine)

Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Helliker, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) (use of registration data in granting other applications)  Text

Cal. for Alternatives to Toxics v. Dep’t of Food & Agric., 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 638 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) (abuse of discretion by  agency)  Text

Carrancho v. Cal. Air Res. Bd., 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) (agency’s decision complied with the statute)  Text


COLORADO

Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation Dist. v. Trout Unlimited, 219 P.3d 774 (Colo. 2009) (agency’s decision was reasonable)  Text

North Sterling Irrigation District v. Simpson, 202 P.3d 1207 (Colo. 2009) (state water engineer did not exceed statutory authority in administering storage rights)  Text


CONNECTICUT

Lawendy v. Ct. Bd. of Veterinary Med., 109 Conn.App. 113 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008) (review of vet board’s decision to revoke license)

Landis v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., No. 127137, 2004 WL 1664131, at *1 (Conn. Super. Ct. June 30, 2004) (action for denial of CWA application)


FLORIDA

Siegers Seed Co. v. Williams Farm P’ship, 17 So.3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009) (final agency action)  Text

Fla. Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Haire, 865 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004) (seeking to prevent the destruction of trees deemed to have been exposed to citrus canker) Text

Fla. Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Haire, 836 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003), approved, 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004) (challenging Citrus Canker Law amendments) Text


GEORGIA

Ga. Dep’t of Agric. v. Brown, 607 S.E.2d 259 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004) (termination from farmers’ market)  Text


IDAHO

Rammell v. Idaho Dep’t of Agric., 210 P.3d 523 (Idaho 2009) (review of hearing officer’s decision)  Text


INDIANA

Jennings Water, Inc. v. Office of Envtl. Adjudication, 909 N.E.2d 1020 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (judicial review of agency denial of administrative review of permit)  Text

Sexton v. Jackson County Bd. of Zoning, 884 N.E.2d 889 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (standing to challenge granting of special exemption to build hog farm)  Text


IOWA

Litterer v. Judge, 644 N.W.2d 357 (Iowa 2002) (no legal authority for rulemaking)   Text


KANSAS

Frick Farm Props., L.P. v. Kansas, 216 P.3d 170 (Kan. 2009) (review of agency decision to terminate water right)  Text

Davenport Pastures, LP v. Morris County Bd. of County Comm’r, 194 P.3d 1201 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (review of commissioners’ decision to award damages for vacation of unimproved roads)  Text

Frick Farm Prop., Ltd. P’ship v. State, Dep’t of Agric., 190 P.3d 983 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (review of agency decision)

Hawley v. Kan. Dep’t of Agric., 132 P.3d 870 (Kan. 2006) (proper notice given)


KENTUCKY

Dailey v. Am. Growers Ins., 103 S.W.3d 60 (Ky. 2003) (Merrill doctrine)


LOUISIANA

Johnson v. Strain, 2015-0714 (La. App. 1 Cir. 11/6/15), 183 So. 3d 562 (judicial review) Text

Piazza’s Seafood World, LLC v. Odom, 2007-2191 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/23/08), 6 So. 3d 820 (action for preliminary injunction against seafood regulation) Text


MARYLAND

Md.  Dep’t of Agric. v. Hammond, 907 A.2d 306 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2006) (remanding agency’s decision to revoke license)

Maryland Dep’t of Agr. v. Hammond, 170 Md. App. 344, 907 A.2d 306 (2006) (judicial review od agency’s decision to revoke license) Text


MICHIGAN

Pontiac Food Ctr. v. Dep’t of Cmty. Health, 282 Mich. App. 331 (2008)( judicial review) Text

Sierra Club Mackinac Charter v. Dep’t of Envtl. Quality, 747 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007) (invalidating state CAFO rule)  Text


MINNESOTA

In re Dairy Dozen-Theif River Falls, LLP, Nos. A09-936, A09-1406, 2010 WL 2161781 (Minn. Ct. App. June 01, 2010) (timeliness of appeal for feedlot permit)

Gunnink v. Minnesota, No. A09-396, 2010 WL 10388 (Minn. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2009) (state’s authority to conduct inspection did not violate 4th Amendment)


MISSOURI

Mo. Soybean Ass’n v. Mo. Clean Water Comm’n, 102 S.W.3d 10 (Mo. 2003) (lack of subject matter to challenge list prepared by agency)  Text


MONTANA

Whitehall Wind, LLC v. Mont. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 223 P.3d 907 (Mont. 2010) (determination agency’s rate determination was unreasonable)  Text


NEBRASKA

In re 2007 Admin. Of Appropriations of Water of Niobrara River, 768 N.W.2d 420 (Neb. 2009) (administrative proceedings not moot)  Text

Swift & Co. v. Nebraska Dep’t of Revenue, 278 Neb. 763 (2009) (judicial review of sales tax refund denial) Text

Spear T Ranch, Inc. v. Knaub, 691 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 2005) (doctrine of primary jurisdiction)  Text


NEW JERSEY

In re Agric., Aquacultural, & Horticultural Water Usage Certification Rules, 891 A.2d 99 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Civ. 2009) (challenging new water use regulations for agriculture)

Atlantic County Soc’y for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. City of Absecon, No. L-16946-06, 2009 WL 1562967 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 5, 2009) (open records request)

N.J. Soc’y for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. N.J. Dep’t of Agric., 955 A.2d 866 (N.J. 2008) (farm animal cruelty regulations were arbitrary and capricious)


NEW YORK

Spence v. New York State Dep’t of Agric. & Markets, 61 Misc. 3d 337, 84 N.Y.S.3d 305 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2016) (judicial review) Text

Brown v. N.Y. State Racing and Wagering Bd., 871 N.Y.S.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) (enjoining agency action)

Humane Soc’y of U.S. v. Brennan, 861 N.Y.S.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008) (freedom of information request)   Text

Humane Soc’y of U.S. v. Empire State Dev. Corp., 53 A.D.3d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008) (lack of taxpayer standing)  Text


NORTH CAROLINA

Wallace Farm, Inc. v. City of Charlotte, 689 S.E.2d 922 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010) (request for records related to landowners’ farm)


OHIO

A & Q Mkt., Inc. Liquor Control Comm’n, No. 09AP-283, 2009 WL 3633875 (Nov. 3, 2009) (jurisdiction of state commission)  Text

Ohio Fresh Eggs, L.L.C. v. Boggs, 917 N.E.2d 833 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009) (denial of attorneys’ fees for unreasonable permit revocation)

Egbert v. Ohio Dep’t of Agric., No. 17-08-15, 2008 WL 4559970 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2008) (revocation of license to sale livestock)  Text

U.S. v. Childers, 789 N.E.2d 691 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003) (exhaustion of remedies)


OKLAHOMA

In re Canadian River Land & Cattle Co., 2011 OK CIV APP 117, 269 P.3d 40 (judicial review of license)


OREGON

Hawes v. State, 125 P.3d 778 (Or. Ct. App. 2005) (agreement with EPA was not “final order” that was judicable reviewable)  Text


SOUTH CAROLINA

McMillan v. S.C. Dep’t of Agric., 364 S.C. 60, 611 S.E.2d 323 (Ct. App. 2005), rev’d, 380 S.C. 212, 670 S.E.2d 368 (2008) (action for recovery of losses) Text


SOUTH DAKOTA

A.M. Farms v. County of Codington, 765 N.W.2d 550 (S.D. 2009) (duty to follow proper disaster declaration procedures is discretionary)  Text


TEXAS

Texas Dep’t of Agric. v. Wild Boar Meats, L.L.C., No. 03-17-00514-CV, 2018 WL 3748677, at *1 (Tex. App. Aug. 8, 2018), review denied (May 31, 2019) (claims for injunctive and declaratory relief)


VERMONT

In re Hinsdale Farm, 858 A.2d 249 (Vt. 2004) (lack of jurisdiction by agency)  Text


WASHINGTON

Ted Rasmussen Farms v. Dep’t of Ecology, 110 P.3d 823 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005) (agency rule exceeding statutory authority)  Text

Littleton v. Whatcom County, 86 P.3d 1253 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004) (invalidation of agency rule)  Text


WISCONSIN

Metz v. Veterinary Examining Bd., 741 N.W.2d 244 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007) (exhaustion of remedies)  Text